Going Negative: The Next Horizon in Climate Engineering Law
This article frames the emerging legal challenges for climate engineering research and deployment.
Mind the Gap: Marine Geoengineering and the Law of the Sea
This chapter, from the book High Seas Governance, examines the legal framework for marine geoengineering, analyzing the extent to which the modern law of the sea has responded to the gaps and challenges in the current regulatory framework.
The Missing Pieces of Geoengineering Research Governance
This Article develops mechanisms to address the systemic concerns, including technological lock-in, moral hazard, and global conflict, and the physical risks of geoengineering research.
Murky Waters: Ambiguous International Law for Ocean Fertilization and Other Geoengineering
This article analyzes the Haida Salmon Restoration Corporation's ocean fertilization activities under the London Convention and London Protocol.
Engineering a Solution to Climate Change: Suggestions for an International Treaty Regime Governing Geoengineering
This Note examines the international law that could govern geoengineering programs, with a focus on ocean iron fertilization and how international law must require that geoengineering be done on a multilateral scale.
Marine Geo-Engineering: Legally Binding Regulation under the London Protocol
This article explores the 2013 amendments to the London Protocol that regulate ocean fertilization and additional emerging marine geo-engineering activities.
A Matter of Scale: Regional Climate Engineering and the Shortfalls of Multinational Governance
This article explores new ways to regulate climate engineering research through a cumulative bottom-up governance approach that would rely on networks of regional treaties, agreements and resolutions rather than a sweeping international convention.
Regulating Geoengineering in International Environmental Law
The article shows how regulating geoengineering activities, including ocean iron fertilization, through existing environmental protection regimes may lead to a governance and legal landscape that is fragmented, incoherent, and incomprehensive.