• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Paris Agreement

Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Paris market mechanisms for negative emissions and the role of the SDGs

2017
Scholarly Work
Matthias Honegger
This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on how Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and lessons learned from the SDGs can guide negative emissions policy.

The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design

2017
Scholarly Work
Matthias Honegger, David Reiner
This paper sees the market mechanism under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement – colloquially called ‘Sustainable Development Mechanism’ – as a possible cornerstone policy instrument to incentivize NET activities at a global scale.

The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture

2017
Scholarly Work
Adriana Marcucci, Socrates Kypreos, Evangelos Panos
This paper evaluates the potential role of direct air capture (DAC) in achieving the Paris Agreement temperature targets, as well as the resultant impact on policy costs and global energy consumption.

Climate Engineering Under the Paris Agreement

2016
Think Tank Report
A. Neil Craik, William C.G. Burns
This report examines the specific provisions of the Paris Agreement with a view to identifying where legal and policy questions in relation to climate engineering are likely to arise.

Implications of the Paris Agreement for Carbon Dioxide Removal and Solar Geoengineering

2016
Scholarly Work
Joshua B. Horton, David W. Keith, Matthias Honneger
This report surveys the implications of the Paris Agreement for carbon dioxide removal (CDR).

What If Negative Emission Technologies Fail at Scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for Big Emitting Nations

2012
Scholarly Work
Alice Larkin, Jaise Kuriakose, Maria Sharmina , Kevin Anderson
This article presents an alternative approach to consider what the Paris Agreement implies: if negative emission technologies (NETs) are unable to deliver more carbon sinks than sources.

Preconditions for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Tanzania

2019
Scholarly Work
Anders Hansson, Mathias Fridahl, Simon Haikola, Pius Yanda, Noah Pauline, Edmund Mabhuye
This paper analyzes the pre-conditions for BECCS in Tanzania, and argues that negative BECCS-related emissions from Tanzania should not be assumed in global climate mitigation scenarios.

Evidence Brief: Governing Nature-Based Solutions to Carbon Dioxide Removal

2019
Think Tank Report
Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G)
This briefing summarizes the latest evidence relating to the governance of Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) along with the governance frameworks and other socio-political considerations.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones