• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

International Policy/Guidance

Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Paris market mechanisms for negative emissions and the role of the SDGs

2017
Scholarly Work
Matthias Honegger
This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on how Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and lessons learned from the SDGs can guide negative emissions policy.

Carbon Dioxide Removal after Paris: Incentivizing without Committing

2017
Scholarly Work
Albert C. Lin
This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on the Paris Agreement's Article 4.4 and Article 5.1 and carbon dioxide removal.

Cost-effective mitigation including negative emissions – the role of markets and MRV

2017
Scholarly Work
Axel Michaelowa
This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on the role of markets in mitigating climate change via negative emissions.

Human rights and climate engineering policy

2017
Scholarly Work
Jesse L. Reynolds
This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on human rights and climate engineering.

The Role of Bioenergy and Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in the Case of Delayed Climate Policy – Insights from Cost-Risk Analysis

2017
Scholarly Work
Jana Mintenig, Mohammad M. Khabbazan, Hermann Held
This study, using a cost-risk analysis approach, evaluates the impact of BECCS in light of a delayed climate policy.

The political economy of negative emissions technologies: consequences for international policy design

2017
Scholarly Work
Matthias Honegger, David Reiner
This paper sees the market mechanism under Article 6.4 of the Paris Agreement – colloquially called ‘Sustainable Development Mechanism’ – as a possible cornerstone policy instrument to incentivize NET activities at a global scale.

The Need for Governance of Climate Geoengineering

2017
Scholarly Work
Janos Pasztor
This article, part of the literature accompanying the launch of the Carnegie Climate Geoengineering Governance Initiative, argues that policymakers need to take an ethical risk management approach to the governance of geoengineering.

Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance

2017
Scholarly Work
Jeffrey McGee, Kerryn Brent, Wil Burns
This article draws on discussions from the 2016 Marine Geoengineering Symposium to highlight prominent marine geoengineering proposals and raise questions about the readiness of the international law system to govern its research and implementation.

How scientists advising the European Commission on research priorities view climate engineering proposals

2017
Scholarly Work
Raffael Himmelsbach
This study explores how scientists who advise the European Commission on research funding priorities regarding climate change and sustainability view climate engineering.

Geoengineering governance-by-default: an earth system governance perspective

2017
Scholarly Work
Anita Talberg, Peter Christoff, Sebastian Thomas, David Karoly
This paper finds that geoengineering is subject to a form of ‘governance-by-default’ due to a situation in which state actors have not resolved the tension between two legal norms: that of ‘precaution’ and that of ‘harm minimisation’.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones