Climate engineering and human rights
In this Forum, three scholars discuss how climate engineering will pose novel human rights challenges, and may well force reconsideration of how human rights are applied as a guide to action.
Comment on Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?
This is a commentary on the article ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?' that speaks to a concern in the article about a carbon crediting methodology over-allocating carbon credits for seagrass.
‘Slippery slope’ or ‘uphill struggle’? Broadening out expert scenarios of climate engineering research and development
This article suggests that the governance challenges for climate engineering should be thought of as less of a slippery slope than an ‘uphill struggle’ and that there is a need for governance that incentivizes, rather than constrains, research.
Reply to Macreadie et al Comment on ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’
This article is a response to the Macreadie (et al) challenge of the ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’ paper, in which a proposal for an international protocol to quantify carbon burial in seagrass is presented.
Comment on ‘Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?’
This comment seeks to clarify some of the questions raised by Johannessen and Macdonald, with an aim to promote discussion in the scientific community about the evidence for carbon sequestration by seagrasses with a view to awarding carbon credits.
Cooperation for reforestation in North Korea: International perspectives and governance
This study provides an overview of North Korea's efforts and its interaction with South Korean and international organizations on reforestation, and identifies institutional aspects that hinder implementation of cooperative governance arrangements.
Governing geoengineering sustainably: A scenario exercise to inform Australian geoengineering policy development
This thesis investigates how a scenario exercise can inform sustainable geoengineering governance in Australia.
The post-carbon society: Rethinking the international governance of negative emissions
This paper suggests that national strategies to promote negative emissions will remain absent until the international climate regime formalizes rules and incentives for such efforts, recognizing them as legitimate national contributions.
South Korea’s Legal and Regulatory System for Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Backgrounds, Current Circumstances, and Recommendations
This paper provides a roadmap for South Korea’s CCS legal and regulatory framework, including both legislative and government agency centered proposals.
Ocean Solutions to Address Climate Change and Its Effects on Marine Ecosystems
This paper provides a comprehensive and systematic assessment of 13 ocean-based climate change mitigation and adaptation measures, including ocean fertilization, alkalization, and hybrid land/ocean methods such as marine BECCS and biochar.