• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Best Practice for Transitioning from Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Enhanced Oil Recovery EOR to CO2 Storage

2017
Scholarly Work
Ken Allinson, Dan Burt, Lisa Campbell, Lisa Constable, Mark Crombie, Arthur Lee, Vinicius Lima, Tim Lloyd, Lee Solsbey
International Policy/Guidance
Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage → Carbon Capture and Storage
European Union, United States, Australia, Canada, Brazil, Enhanced Oil Recovery
Download PDF

Summary/Abstract

This paper identifies the legal, regulatory and economic challenges in the USA, Canada, EU, Australia, and Brazil that must be addressed if an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project is to serve as a CCS project. The paper finds that there is a clear regulatory framework for CO2 EOR and for CCS in most regions but there are insufficient provisions that would allow a CO2 EOR operator to follow a clear transition pathway for legal and regulatory approval of a CCS project. Permitting requirements for design, commissioning, operational management, decommissioning and post-closure site stewardship, if any, differ for CO2 EOR and CCS projects. The paper recommends that specific guidance or regulation be provided setting out the specific requirements on new and existing CO2 EOR projects which may wish to transition to CCS.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones