• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

Search our resource database and use the tools below to filter your results.

Filter by Technical Pathway:
Filter by Legal Pathway:
Filter by Keyword:
Filter by Publication Year:
Filter by Resource Type:
Text Search:
Current Filters:

HB 2419 – Kansas CCS Tax Incentive

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of Kansas
Kansas’ HB 2419 provides for income tax reductions and abatement of property taxes applicable to the power plant and the sequestration site for a generation project that sequesters CO2.

N.M. Stat. Ann. § 62-6-28

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of New Mexico
Allows utilities to recover costs incurred for clean energy projects, including coal-based plants using CCS to achieve 1,100 lbs CO2/MWh limit.

Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 80.80.040

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of Washington
Institutes fossil fueled generating plant emissions performance standard of 1,100 lbs CO2/MWh that may be met in part through carbon capture and storage, including geologic sequestration.

La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 30:4

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of Louisiana
Authorizes Department of Conservation to regulate the construction, design, and operation of pipelines transmitting CO2 to enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects.

Minn. Stat. Ann. § 216H.03

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of Minnesota
Excludes CO2 captured and geologically sequestered for purposes of a ban on constructing power plants that contribute to state carbon dioxide emissions.

N.D. Cent. Code § 17-01-01

2007
Enacted Legislation
State of North Dakota
Adoption of 25x25 Initiative, which supports use of carbon sequestration as part of the effort to get 25% of American energy from America’s renewable natural resources, while continuing to provide adequate food.

Iron Fertilization in the Ocean for Climate Mitigation: Legal, Economic, and Environmental Challenges

2007
Scholarly Work
Raphael Sagarin, Megan Dawson, David Karl, Anthony Michael, Brian Murray, Michael Orbach, Nicole St. Clair
This paper is aimed to provide lawmakers, non-government organizations, the public and business interests with a brief overview of iron fertilization and its potential benefits and risks.

Deploying Carbon Capture and Storage in Europe and the United States: A Comparative Analysis

2007
Scholarly Work
Andrew J. Gibbons, Elizabeth Wilson
This paper explores the existing energy, policy, regulatory and legal climates that will necessitate different approaches for CCS deployment in the United States and European Union.

Regulatory challenges to the implementation of carbon capture and geological storage within the European Union under EU and international law

2007
Scholarly Work
M.J. Mace, Chris Hendriks, Rogier Coenraads
This paper takes a look at international environmental law principles relevant to CCS, identifies key environmental and safety risks associated with the technology, and highlights significant legal frameworks that pose challenges to implementation.

The Legal Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage in Alberta

2007
Scholarly Work
Nigel Bankes, Jenette Poschwatta, E. Mitchell Shier
This article examines the property, regulatory, and liability issues associated with CCS in an Alberta context.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones