• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Carbon Dioxide Removal


BECCS

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is a technique where biomass is grown and converted into electricity, heat, or fuel, and the carbon emissions from this conversion are captured and stored in geological formations or embedded in long-lasting products. The capture and storage process is similar to the approach in a carbon capture and storage facility connected to a fossil fuel power plant.
Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Technological Carbon Removal: Recent Economic and Political Trends in the United States

2019
Think Tank Report
Climate Advisers
This report assesses the current state of affairs surrounding technological CDR in the United States and provides concrete policy recommendations for action at the Federal level.

Carbon Removal: Comparing Historical Federal Research Investments with the National Academies’ Recommended Future Funding Levels

2019
Think Tank Report
The Bipartisan Policy Center
The objective of this analysis is to review the historical baseline estimates of federal RD&D investment related to carbon removal and assess how they compare with the recommended future funding levels from the 2018 National Academies Report on NETs.

Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future We Want

2019
Scientific Report
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP)
UNEP's Global Resources Outlook highlights and supports climate policies to remove atmospheric carbon in its "Towards Sustainability" scenario, specifically policies targeted towards the deployment of BECCs, DAC, and reforestation activities.

Rich man’s solution? Climate engineering discourses and the marginalization of the Global South

2019
Scholarly Work
Frank Biermann, Ina Möller
This article maps a lack of involvement of developing countries in the climate engineering discourse and highlights the degree to which their concerns remain insufficiently represented in politically significant scientific assessment reports.

Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system

2019
Scholarly Work
Calum Brown, Peter Alexander, Ian Holman, Almut Arneth, Mark Rounsevell
This paper suggests that improved recognition of different land-system policies and lags in land-system change is necessary to identify achievable mitigation actions and avoid excessively optimistic assumptions and consequent policy failures.

Engineered CO2 Removal, Climate Restoration, and Humility

2019
Scholarly Work
Julio Friedmann
This article lays out how using engineered CDR techniques to achieve net-zero will require substantial cooperation between groups of people who commonly do not work together, including technical experts, financiers, and government officials.

Clearing the Air: A Federal RD&D Initiative and Management Plan for Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies

2019
Think Tank Report
Energy Futures Initiative
This report provides a set of recommendations and detailed implementation plans for a 10-year, $10.7 billion research, development, and demonstration initiative in the United States to bring new pathways for technological CDR to commercial readiness.

Using Renewable Portfolio Standards to Accelerate Development of Negative Emission Technologies

2018
Scholarly Work
Anthony Chavez
This article discusses how states can use Renewable Portfolio Standards to incentivize the development of negative emission technologies.

Challenges to the Use of BECCS as a Keystone Technology in Pursuit of 1.5ºC

2018
Scholarly Work
Clair Gough, Samira Garcia-Freites, Christopher Jones, Sarah Mander, Brendan Moore, Cristina Pereira, Mirjam Röder, Naomi Vaughan, Andrew Welfle
This paper explores six key challenges in relation to large scale BECCS deployment and considers ways to address these challenges.

Near-term Deployment of Carbon Capture and Sequestration from Biorefineries in the United States

2018
Scholarly Work
Daniel Sanchez, Nils Johnson, Sean McCoy, Peter Turner, Katharine Mach
This paper evaluates low-cost, commercially ready sequestration opportunities for existing biorefineries in the United States.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2026 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones