• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Carbon Dioxide Removal

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, or negative emission technologies (NETs), are a suite of natural and technological pathways to remove and sequester carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air. Unlike carbon capture and storage, these techniques remove CO₂ directly from the atmosphere or enhance natural carbon sinks.
Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

BECCS Potential in Brazil: Achieving Negative Emissions in Ethanol and Electricity Production Based on Sugar Cane Bagasse and Other Residues

2016
Scholarly Work
José Roberto Moreira, Viviane Romeiro, Sabine Fuss, Florian Kraxner, Sérgio A. Pacca
This paper assesses the potential and cost effectiveness of negative emissions in the joint production system of ethanol and electricity based on sugar cane, bagasse, and other residues in Brazil.

Bioenergy Carbon Capture and Storage in Global Climate Policy: Examining the Issues

2016
Scholarly Work
Robert Amos
This article explores some of the legal challenges in developing the bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) industry, specifically the land-use implications, trade and economic issues and the broader environmental legal context.

Human Rights Dimensions of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage: A Framework for Climate Justice in the Realm of Climate Geoengineering

2016
Scholarly Work
Wil Burns
This chapter assesses the human rights implications of Bioenergy and Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) climate geoengineering options.

Farmer perceptions, policy and reforestation in Santa Catarina, Brazil

2016
Scholarly Work
A.C.D. Trevisan, A.L. Schmitt-Filho, J. Farley, A.C. Fantini, C. Longo
This article evaluates three policy options for promoting reforestation, paying particular attention to the impacts on farmer livelihoods and their intrinsic willingness to restore and preserve forest cover.

SB 859 – Healthy Soils Program

2016
Enacted Legislation
State of California
The legislation funded the Healthy Soils Program, which offers producers incentives to adopt GHG-reducing soil health practices and funds on-farm demonstration projects.

The State and Future of U.S. Soils: Framework for a Federal Strategic Plan for Soil Science

2016
Scientific Report
Subcommittee on Ecological Systems, Committee on Environment, Natural Resources, and Sustainability of the National Science and Technology Council
This Framework aims to establish Federal soil research priorities, including in carbon sequestration, deliver information to land managers to help them implement soil conserving systems, and inform related policy development and coordination.

Soil Health and Carbon Sequestration in US Croplands: A Policy Analysis

2016
Scholarly Work
Léopold Biardeau, Rebecca Crebbin-Coates, Ritt Keerati, Sara Litke, Hortencia Rodríguez
This report examines current policy challenges and opportunities for the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) in increasing the adoption of soil health and carbon sequestration practices.

Soil carbon sequestration potential of US croplands and grasslands: Implementing the 4 per Thousand Initiative

2016
Scholarly Work
Adam Chambers, Rattan Lal, Keith Paustian
In this analysis, the goals of the 4 per Thousand declaration are assessed in the US context, looking for the best opportunities or “bright spots” that could be managed to implement the 4PT program.

Geoengineering with seagrasses: is credit due where credit is given?

2016
Scholarly Work
Sophia C Johannessen, Robie W Macdonald
This article argues that geoengineering with seagrasses before reliable assessment methods have been established can result in overestimated carbon offsets that could lead to a net increase in emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.

Distinguishing morale hazard from moral hazard in geoengineering

2016
Scholarly Work
Andrew Lockley, D’Maris Coffman
This paper investigates the definitions and use of the term ‘moral hazard’, and the related (but significantly different) concept of ‘morale hazard’, in the context of geoengineering and in relevant law, economic and insurance literatures.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones