• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Convention on Biological Diversity

Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Geoengineering and International Law: The Search for Common Legal Ground

2010
Scholarly Work
Ralph Bodle
The focus of this article is on overarching rules of international law that are common legal ground and might apply to all concepts under the heading "geoengineering," while exploring to what extent the ENMOD Convention could be useful as a reference

UN Convention on Biological Diversity Decision X/29

2010
International Legal Instrument
Convention on Biological Diversity
Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its tenth meeting on the impacts of ocean fertilization.

UN Convention on Biological Diversity Decision IX/16

2008
International Legal Instrument
Convention on Biological Diversity
Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting.

Convention on Biological Diversity COP 9 Decision IX/16

2008
International Legal Instrument
Convention on Biological Diversity
Decision adopted by the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting requesting that Governments, in accordance with the precautionary approach, ensure that ocean fertilization activities do not take place until there is further research.

Convention on Biological Diversity COP 9 Decision IX/20

2008
International Legal Instrument
Convention on Biological Diversity
Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its ninth meeting to seek, in consultation with the IMO, the views of Parties, other Governments, and indigenous peoples on ocean iron fertilization.

Political Perspectives on Geoengineering: Navigating Problem Definition and Institutional Fit

2020
Scholarly Work
Ina Möller
This study identifies that common elements of geoengineering problem definitions conflict with the institutional setting of policy makers, and provides examples of how policy makers act as agents in creating institutional fit.

Policy Brief: Governing Nature-Based Solutions to Carbon Dioxide Removal

2019
Think Tank Report
Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G)
This policy brief identifies the governance challenges around Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to carbon dioxide removal including techniques such as large-scale planting of forests, replacing previously lost forests, and restoring wetlands.

Bioenergy and Carbon Capture with Storage (BECCS): The Prospects and Challenges of an Emerging Climate Policy Response

2017
Scholarly Work
Wil Burns, Simon Nicholson
This article suggests that a human rights-based approach can help to protect the interests of those who might be adversely impacted by BECCS deployment.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones