This is a presentation from the Climate Engineering Conference 2017 (CEC17) on the Paris Agreement's Article 4.4 and Article 5.1 and carbon dioxide removal.
Paul Leadley, Rob Alkemade, Almut Arneth, Cornelia Krug, Alexander Popp, Carlo Rondinini, Elke Stehfest, Detlef van Vuuren
This report focuses on the interactions between landāuse options for climate change mitigation efforts, including BECCS, and the impact on biodiversity.
Using the example of geoengineering, this paper considers how tensions between climate mitigation and management and conservation goals are likely to be addressed under the UNCLOS and UNFCCC regimes.
This article explores new ways to regulate climate engineering research through a cumulative bottom-up governance approach that would rely on networks of regional treaties, agreements and resolutions rather than a sweeping international convention.
This article argues for an international agreement to be established to regulate decisions regarding the testing and use of geoengineering and that Australia should adopt a strong leadership role in relation to any international regulatory efforts.
This article analyzes how the the negotiations during the Kyoto Protocol determined whether changes in carbon stocks from forestry and land-use should be accounted for in the Kyoto framework.