• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5 °C policy choices

2016
News/Commentary
Glen Peters
International Policy/Guidance
Carbon Dioxide Removal
Carbon Dioxide Removal → BECCS
UNFCCC

2 Resources:

Commentary from Natural Climate Change Vol. 6

Download PDF

Supplementary Information

Download PDF

Summary/Abstract

This commentary identifies why an IPCC Special Report on 1.5 °C should focus on resolving fundamental scientific and political uncertainties, not fixate on developing unachievable mitigation pathways. The commentary builds on key findings in the IPCC AR5, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Emissions Gap Report and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC) Synthesis Report, to identify key scientific knowledge gaps on mitigation pathways that need to be addressed in the potential IPCC Special Report specifically requested by policy makers in Paris.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones