• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

United States

Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Miss. Code Ann. § 11-27-47

1984
Enacted Legislation
State of Mississippi
Empowers counties to regulate the construction and maintenance of CO2 transmission pipelines.

Analyzing Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Technology Development: A case study approach

2020
Scholarly Work
Mac Osazuwa-Peters, Margot Hurlbert
This article provides a review of a portfolio of regulations advancing CCS including technical regulations, pore space ownership, monitoring, enforcement and verification of CO2 injection.

Emerging policy perspectives on geoengineering: An international comparison

2015
Scholarly Work
Suvi Huttunen, Emmi Skytén, Mikael Hildén
This paper examines a wide variety of policy documents from different countries, international organizations and NGOs to gain insights into how geoengineering is perceived at the policy level.

The Impact of Liability on the Adoption and Diffusion of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Technologies

2015
Scholarly Work
Elizabeth Joan Wilson, Mark A. de Figueiredo
This paper links potential CCS system requirements with potential risks and damages and examines how damages are treated in the subsurface injection realm, with particular attention paid to Texas and California regulations and case law.

Ownership Models for Geological Sequestration: A Comparison of the Emergent Regulatory Models in Australia and the United States

2014
Scholarly Work
Samantha Hepburn
This paper compares the Australian and U.S. models of geologic ownership for CCS, arguing that the Australian model of state ownership is preferable as it provides clarity, structure, and certainty for CCS markets.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: A Regulatory Gap Assessment

2012
Scholarly Work
Lincoln Davies, Kirsten Uchitel, John Ruple, Heather Tanana
This report identifies a need for a comprehensive CCS regulatory regime based around a cooperative federalism approach that directly addresses liability concerns and that generally does not upset traditional lines of federal-state authority.

A Cooperative Federalism Framework for CCS Regulation

2012
Scholarly Work
Jonas J. Monast, Brooks R. Pearson, Lincoln F. Pratson
This paper reviews the history of cooperative federalism and how it may provide a framework to determine appropriate roles for federal and state governments, and applies that framework to the gaps in the CCS regulatory structure.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration in Texas: Navigating the Legal Challenges Related to Pore Space Ownership

2011
Scholarly Work
Christopher J. Miller
This article navigates the legal challenges related to pore space ownership in Texas, what regulatory actions are needed to clear a path for CCS, and the risk of liability related to CCS and pore space ownership.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones