• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

Search our resource database and use the tools below to filter your results.

Filter by Technical Pathway:
Filter by Legal Pathway:
Filter by Keyword:
Filter by Publication Year:
Filter by Resource Type:
Text Search:
Current Filters:

The pore space scramble; challenges and opportunities for subsurface governance

2018
Scholarly Work
Alexandra M. Gormally, Nils O. Markusson, Michelle Bentham
This paper highlights three challenges of pore space governance from a UK perspective: ownership, access, and long term stewardship.

The Politics and Governance of Negative Emissions Technologies

2018
Scholarly Work
Klaus Radunsky
This paper proposes that a limited use of geoengineering should help meet the goals of the Paris Agreement provided that decarbonization is significantly accelerated beyond the plans included in current National Determined Contributions.

Mind the Gap: Marine Geoengineering and the Law of the Sea

2018
Scholarly Work
Karen N. Scott
This chapter, from the book High Seas Governance, examines the legal framework for marine geoengineering, analyzing the extent to which the modern law of the sea has responded to the gaps and challenges in the current regulatory framework.

Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects

2018
Scholarly Work
Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb, Max W Callaghan, Jérôme Hilaire, Felix Creutzig, Thorben Amann, Tim Beringer, Wagner de Oliveira Garcia, Jens Hartmann, Tarun Khanna, Gunnar Luderer, Gregory F Nemet, Joeri Rogelj, Pete Smith, José Luis Vicente Vicente, Jennifer Wilcox, Maria del Mar Zamora Dominguez, Jan C Minx
This paper, part 2 of a 3 part series on negative emissions, presents estimates of costs, potentials, and side-effects for negative emission technologies.

Governing geoengineering sustainably: A scenario exercise to inform Australian geoengineering policy development

2018
Scholarly Work
Anita Talberg
This thesis investigates how a scenario exercise can inform sustainable geoengineering governance in Australia.

CarbonSAFE: Commercialization of Emerging Environmental Sustainability Technologies: CCS Development & Implementation Policy

2018
Think Tank Report
Design Assurance Sciences
This report, developed in support of the CarbonSAFE initiative, was assembled to assist in identifying local, state, and national regulatory and policy positions impacting the establishment of a CCS storage complex.

Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios

2018
Scholarly Work
Naomi E Vaughan, Clair Gough, Sarah Mander, Emma W Littleton, Andrew Welfle, David E H J Gernaat, Detlef P van Vuuren
This paper looks into the detailed assumptions and results of a single Integrated Assessment Model (IAM), the IMAGE model framework, to learn more about the required implementation strategy of the default mitigation response using BECCS.

Carbon Capture Coalition Letter Re: Section 45Q Carbon Sequestration Credit

2018
Policy Proposal
Carbon Capture Coalition
This is the Carbon Capture Coalition’s model guidance on the 45Q tax credit implementation, submitted to Department of the Treasury.

IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Chapter 4: Transport of CO2

2018
Scientific Report
David Coleman, John Davison, Chris Hendriks, Olav Kaarstad, Masahiko Ozaki
This chapter from the IPCC's special report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage provides an overview of the methods of transportation of carbon dioxide and the international regulatory framework governing its movement.

Opportunities and Trade-Offs Among BECCS and the Food, Water, Energy, Biodiversity, and Social Systems Nexus at Regional Scales

2018
Scholarly Work
Paul Stoy, Selena Ahmed, Meghann Jarchow, Benjamin Rashford, David Swanson, Shannon Albeke, Gabriel Bromley, E.N.J. Brookshire, Mark Dixon, Julia Haggerty, Perry Miller, Brent Peyton, Alisa Royem, Lee Spangler, Crista Straub, Benjamin Poulter
This paper presents an interdisciplinary research framework to examine the trade-offs as well as the opportunities among BECCS scenarios using the Upper Missouri River Basin (UMRB) as a case study.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2026 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones