International Law Issues on the Technology Using of Carbon Capture and Sequestration
This paper explores how the present international legal system can be applied and adapted to the spreading using of CCS.
Carbon Capture and Storage from the Perspective of International Law
This chapter explores carbon capture and storage from the perspective of international law
Carbon Capture and Storage in South Dakota: The Need for a Clear Designation of Pore Space Ownership
This comment considers state legislation on pore space ownership and examines existing subsurface case law in South Dakota to support the notion that pore space ownership should rest with the surface state.
Carbon Storage: Discerning Resource Biases that Influence Treaty Negotiations
This article explores the biases encountered during treaty negotiations that impact carbon storage policy.
Climate Change, Carbon Sequestration, and Property Rights
This article considers the role of property rights in efforts to sequester underground hundreds of millions of tons of carbon dioxide per year from power plants and other industrial facilities in order to mitigate climate change.
Towards an Effective Legal Framework for the Geo-Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide in New Zealand
This paper provides an overview of some of the most important legal challenges that the regulation of CCS poses in New Zealand and offers some potential solutions to address these challenges.
A Tale of Two Provinces: Imposing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Constraints through Law and Policy in Alberta and British Columbia
This article provides an overview of two Canadian provinces grappling with greenhouse gas regulatory issues and the developing frameworks to govern processes and practice for carbon capture and sequestration projects.
Ohio Rules on Carbon Injections
Ohio’s SB 165 established that the Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management has the authority to issue permits for underground injection of carbon dioxide for secondary or tertiary recovery of oil or natural gas.
Long-term Liability for Carbon Capture and Storage in Depleted North American Oil and Gas Reservoirs A Comparative Analysis
This article examines emerging legislative frameworks, in a limited number of jurisdictions, that have been adopted to manage long-term liability: viz., Wyoming, Kansas, Montana, the European Union (EU), and Australia.
Issues of liability during the post-abandonment phase of carbon capture and storage: The Case of Alberta, Canada
This paper finds that Alberta’s current framework for assigning the long-term liability for damages arising from CCS is neither clear nor realistic and concludes with policy recommendations to Alberta’s government.