• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Carbon Dioxide Removal

Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) techniques, or negative emission technologies (NETs), are a suite of natural and technological pathways to remove and sequester carbon dioxide (CO₂) from the air. Unlike carbon capture and storage, these techniques remove CO₂ directly from the atmosphere or enhance natural carbon sinks.
Filter by Resource Type:
Filter by Publication Year:
Sort:
Current Filters:

Prospects for a multi-stakeholder dialogue on climate engineering

2018
Scholarly Work
Ken Conca
In this paper lessons from the literature on multi-stakeholder dialogue (MSD) that are relevant to the debate on climate engineering are examined.

The politics and governance of negative emissions technologies

2018
News/Commentary
Jesse L. Reynolds
This is the introductory editorial to the debut issue of Global Sustainability which compiled seven articles on the politics and governance of negative emission technologies.

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage: From global potentials to domestic realities

2018
Think Tank Report
Edited by Mathias Fridahl
This book explores the role of BECCS in climate governance and brings together a range of policy-relevant perspectives from global modeling efforts, climate diplomats' views, and UN and European climate policymaking.

Direct Air Capture of Carbon Dioxide – ICEF Roadmap 2018

2018
Think Tank Report
David Sandalow, Julio Friedmann, Colin McCormick, Sean McCoy
This roadmap explores the potential for direct air capture of carbon dioxide to contribute to climate mitigation (and provide feedstock for commercial processes).

Market-Level Implications of Regulating Forest Carbon Storage and Albedo for Climate Change Mitigation

2018
Scholarly Work
Aapo Rautiainen, Jussi Lintunen, Jussi Uusivuori
This paper explores the optimal regulation of forest carbon and albedo for climate change mitigation and posits that complementing a carbon pricing policy with albedo pricing reduces welfare losses from afforestation.

Grasslands may be more reliable carbon sinks than forests in California

2018
Scholarly Work
Pawlok Dass, Benjamin Z Houlton, Yingping Wang, David Warlind
This paper shows that California grasslands are a more resilient carbon sink than forests in response to 21st century changes in climate, with implications for designing climate-smart Cap and Trade offset policies.

The politics of anticipation: the IPCC and the negative emissions technologies experience

2018
Scholarly Work
Silke Beck, Martin Mahony
This paper discusses what the changing relationship between science and politics means for the IPCC, using recent controversies over NETs as a window into the fraught politics of producing policy-relevant pathways and scenarios.

A New Security Framework for Geoengineering

2018
Scholarly Work
Elizabeth L. Chalecki, Lisa L. Ferrari
This paper argues that modifying just war theory into “just geoengineering theory” will provide ethical standards for security decision makers as they consider whether or how geoengineering should be used.

De facto governance: how authoritative assessments construct climate engineering as an object of governance

2018
Scholarly Work
Aarti Gupta, Ina Möller
This paper discusses how authoritative assessments, meaning expert-led, multi-author assessments produced by eminent scientific bodies, constitute a source of de facto governance and consequently shape the context for de jure types of governance.

A scenario process to inform Australian geoengineering policy

2018
Scholarly Work
Anita Talberg, Sebastian Thomas, John Wiseman
This paper reflects on an Australian geoengineering scenario project as a practical and innovative platform for informing governance.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones