• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

CDR Law

  • Search
  • Other Resources
    • Books
    • International Law
  • About
  • Contact

Resources

Search our resource database and use the tools below to filter your results.

Filter by Technical Pathway:
Filter by Legal Pathway:
Filter by Keyword:
Filter by Publication Year:
Filter by Resource Type:
Text Search:
Current Filters:

Carbon Capture and Storage Regulatory Review for Trinidad and Tobago

2012
Think Tank Report
Jessica Morton, Alice Gibson, Ian Havercroft
This Global CCS Institute review considers how a CCS project, through its entire chain from concept and design to decommissioning, could fit into the current legal and regulatory framework of Trinidad and Tobago in 2012.

Considerations of Justice in Assessment and Appraisal of Negative Emissions Technologies

2012
Scholarly Work
Duncan P. Mclaren
This paper identifies several justice implications arising from the potential moral hazard in the development of NETs, the distribution of geological storage for carbon dioxide, and the competition for biological productivity for negative emissions.

Technical and Regulatory Matters on Geoengineering in Relation to the Convention on Biological Diversity

2012
Scientific Report
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
This study, prepared by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and presented to the CBD's Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, addresses the legal and regulatory framework of geoengineering relevant to the CBD.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration: A Regulatory Gap Assessment

2012
Scholarly Work
Lincoln Davies, Kirsten Uchitel, John Ruple, Heather Tanana
This report identifies a need for a comprehensive CCS regulatory regime based around a cooperative federalism approach that directly addresses liability concerns and that generally does not upset traditional lines of federal-state authority.

Geoengineering a Future for Humankind: Some Technical and Ethical Considerations

2012
Scholarly Work
Rafael Leal-Arcas , Andrew Filis-Yelaghotis
This paper seeks to outline the various contentious issues regarding geoengineering (which here includes ocean fertilization and afforestation) that arise in relation to its ethical, technological, political, and trade-related legal dimensions.

What If Negative Emission Technologies Fail at Scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for Big Emitting Nations

2012
Scholarly Work
Alice Larkin, Jaise Kuriakose, Maria Sharmina , Kevin Anderson
This article presents an alternative approach to consider what the Paris Agreement implies: if negative emission technologies (NETs) are unable to deliver more carbon sinks than sources.

Ocean Fertilization for Geoengineering: A Review of Effectiveness, Environmental Impacts and Emerging Governance

2012
Scholarly Work
Phillip Williamson, Douglas W.R. Wallace, Cliff S. Law, Philip W. Boyd, Yves Collos, Peter Croot, Ken Denman, Ulf Riebesell, Shigenobu Takeda, Chris Vivian
This article identifies the arrangements for the international governance of further field-based research on ocean fertilization that are being developed, primarily under the London Convention/London Protocol.

The Public Pore Space: Enabling Carbon Capture and Sequestration by Reconceptualizing Subsurface Property Rights

2012
Scholarly Work
James Robert Zadick
Recognizing the complications inherent to private control over an essentially public action, this Note aims to demonstrate that pore space ownership should be vested in the public.

Impacts of Climate-Related Geoengineering on Biological Diversity

2012
Scientific Report
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity
This study compiles and synthesizes available scientific information on the possible impacts of a range of geoengineering techniques on biodiversity, including preliminary information on associated social, economic and cultural considerations.

Legal Liability for Carbon Capture and Storage in Australia: Where Should the Losses Fall?

2012
Scholarly Work
Nicola Swayne, Angela Phillips
This article presents a critical analysis of the current and proposed CCS legal frameworks across a number of jurisdictions in Australia in order to examine the legal treatment of the risks of carbon leakage from CCS operations.

Footer

This website provides educational information. It does not, nor is it intended to, provide legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by use of this site. Consult with an attorney for any needed legal advice. There is no warranty of accuracy, adequacy or comprehensiveness. Those who use information from this website do so at their own risk.

© 2021 Sabin Center for Climate Change Law
Made with by Satellite Jones