Carbon Capture and Storage Archives - Page 21 of 46

Umweltbundesamt, Options and Proposals for the International Governance of Geoengineering

2014

Think Tank Report

Ralph Bodle, Sebastian Oberthür, Lena Donat, Gesa Homann, Stephan Sina, Elizabeth Tedsen

In this research project for the German Federal Environment Agency, the Ecologic Institute develops specific proposals for the governance of the main currently discussed geoengineering concepts at the international level.

On the Legal System Construction of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology

2014

Scholarly Work

Huang Liang

This article identifies legal pathways toward implementation of CCS technology in China.

Climate Change Considerations under the Resource Management Act: A Barrier to Carbon Capture and Storage Deployment in New Zealand

2014

Scholarly Work

Greg Severinsen

This article contends that national environmental standards and national policy statements should be developed to direct or enable consent authorities in New Zealand to have regard to the positive aspects of CCS.

Constructing a Legal Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage in New Zealand: Approaches to Legislative Design

2014

Scholarly Work

Greg Severinsen

This paper provides a brief overview of the New Zealand legal and regulatory position on CCS and then seeks to address in more detail one particular issue - that of legislative design for a fledgling CCS regime.

EPA Underground Injection Control Program

2014

Regulation

The EPA’s UIC program regulates and clarifies the use of enhanced oil recovery wells for sequestration.

Update on the London Protocol – Developments on Transboundary CCS and on Geoengineering

2014

Scholarly Work

Tim Dixon, Justine Garrett, Edward Kleverlaan

This paper reviews the regulatory developments relating to transboundary carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) activities and regulation of ocean fertilization arising from the work and agreements under the London Protocol from 2010 to 2013.

Legal Liability and Carbon Capture and Storage: A Comparative Perspective

2014

Think Tank Report

Ian Havercroft, Richard Macrory

The report is intended to highlight key themes that have emerged in thinking about the design of appropriate legal liability regimes for CCS, and uses as core examples for comparison three jurisdictions - Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

Regulatory Promotion of Emergent CCS Technology

2014

Scholarly Work

Lincoln Davies, Kirsten Uchitel, David Johnson

This report examines potential regulatory models for promoting CCS and seeks to assess where those regulatory regimes address or fail to address the impediments to commercial-scale CCS deployment.

Ownership Models for Geological Sequestration: A Comparison of the Emergent Regulatory Models in Australia and the United States

2014

Scholarly Work

Samantha Hepburn

This paper compares the Australian and U.S. models of geologic ownership for CCS, arguing that the Australian model of state ownership is preferable as it provides clarity, structure, and certainty for CCS markets.

Mich. Comp. L. Ann. § 205.303

2014

Enacted Legislation

State of Michigan

Grants a reduced severance tax rate to approved enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects using carbon dioxide injection.

Filter by Resource Type:

Filter by Publication Year:

Sort:

Current Filters: